Trump leads 47% to 43%, worrying some Democrats, while others warn against “crazy poll sickness”

Trump’s Surprising Lead in 2024 Joe Biden leads national polls for the 2024 presidential election in a poll released Saturday, a day after President Donald Trump called his predecessor “despicable” at an event in California. It was shown that

A Wall Street Journal poll shows Mr. Biden’s approval rating is the lowest of his presidency, and the results come less than a year after voters go to the polls. The findings are broadly consistent with other recent studies that have raised concerns among researchers.

The results show Trump leading Biden by 4 points, 47% to 43%, in a head-to-head showdown for the White House, likely in 2024. He said that this poll was the first to show that former President Trump has an advantage. W.S.J.

Including the five potential third-party and independent candidates, all with 17% support, increases Trump’s lead to six points, 37-31.

Mr. Biden has expressed his desire to run for a second term, but many within the Democratic Party fear his aging and want him to step down — if Mr. Biden wins the election. Biden is 81 years old today, and he fears he will be 86 after eight years in the White House. For the Times to win the next year, voters will turn away.

The president’s son Hunter Biden was indicted on nine criminal tax charges in California on Thursday, creating another hurdle in his path to re-election

Meanwhile, Trump is vying for the Republican nomination. Despite winning by almost 1,000 points, RealClearPolitics says he is not a chaser, despite having a 50-point lead, mainly due to his own various legal issues. The candidate, who himself will be 78 on election day, remains at risk from four concurrent criminal cases against him, some of them accusing him of illegal efforts to overturn Biden’s 2020 victory. It was something to do with.

At a fundraiser Friday night, Biden condemned Trump’s actions during the Jan. 6, 2021, riot at the Capitol, when his supporters tried to block Congress from certifying the election results. did.

“It’s despicable. “It’s just despicable,” Biden said in front of California Governor Gavin Newsom and former Democratic House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

He also noted that during President Trump’s interview with Fox News host Sean Hannity this week, he was asked whether he would abuse his power if re-elected. “The other day, he said he would be a dictator someday. God, just for one day! Biden said he doesn’t reject political violence, but rather welcomes it.

His speech is He focused primarily on the threat posed to democracy by President Trump and avoided mentioning the Israel-Gaza war. “You’re the reason Donald Trump is a former president, or, as you may hate me to say, a defeated president,” he told an audience of Democrats. He will not attend the inauguration ceremony.”

Lives in Gaza’s Airstrikes According to Haaretz newspaper, the proportion of civilians killed is higher than in any other world conflict in the 20th century

Lives in Gaza’s Airstrikes – Israeli airstrikes on Gaza are the most indiscriminate in recent years in terms of civilian casualties, according to a study published by an Israeli newspaper.

Haaretz’s analysis shows that Israeli forces are struggling to tighten control in the northern Gaza Strip by bombing Gaza City’s Shejaya district on Saturday, while bombing Rafah, a town on the southern border with Egypt. The announcement was made by the Israeli military to Gaza residents. Seeking protection. The total death toll in the past 24 hours is unknown, but the main hospital in Deir al-Balah in central Gaza reported that 71 bodies had been received, and 62 bodies were transferred to Nasser Hospital in the southern capital, Khan Younis. According to the Hamas-run Health Ministry.

Lives in Gaza’s Airstrikes According to Haaretz analysis, in the last three operations in Gaza from 2012 to 2022, civilian deaths accounted for approximately 40% of total airstrikes. This ratio dropped to 33% during a bombing campaign called Operation Shield and Arrow earlier this year.

In the first three weeks of the ongoing Operation Iron Sword, the proportion of civilians in the total number of deaths rose to 61%, which Haaretz described as “unprecedented killings“. This ratio is significantly higher than the number of civilians in all conflicts around the world in the 20th century, when about half of the deaths were civilians.

“The general conclusion is that the large-scale killing of civilians not only does not contribute to Israel’s security, but also contains grounds for further undermining it,” Haaretz concluded. “Gaza’s residents will rise from the ruins of their homes and the loss of their families to take revenge that no security can withstand.”

This study was published by two other Israeli news sites, +972 Magazine and The investigation, which corroborates an investigation by Local Call, was carried out 10 days ago and showed that Israel deliberately targeted apartment complexes and caused mass casualties among civilians in the hope that people would rebel against their Hamas rulers. It became clear that someone had been sent. The numbers will be troubling for the Biden administration. The Biden administration faces global criticism and isolation after vetoing a U.N. Security Council vote for a ceasefire on Friday.

Since the beginning of the war sparked by Hamas’s deadly attack on Israel on October 7, the United States has sought to persuade the Israeli military to become more sophisticated in its target selection, and the The case has been repeatedly argued as follows. Despite the consistently high number of civilian deaths, the (IDF) has “accepted” US advice.

U.S. national security spokesman John Kirby reiterated that assertion Friday during a briefing for reporters aboard Air Force One, saying, “Certainly more can be done to reduce civilian casualties.” We all recognize that,” he added.

Kirby’s comments come as the Biden administration faces allegations of complicity in war crimes over its veto of Security Council resolutions.

Human Rights Watch said the United States risks being “complicit in war crimes” if it continues to provide arms and diplomatic support to Israel. Paul O’Brien, Amnesty International’s U.S. Executive Director, said: “With this veto, the U.S. government has shamefully committed to contributing to the untold suffering of civilians, the horrific death toll, and unprecedented humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza. I will turn my back on you,” he said. Saudi Foreign Minister Faisal bin Farhan Al Saud met US Secretary of State Antony Blinken in Washington on Friday night, maintaining pressure for “urgent steps” to establish a ceasefire to deliver humanitarian aid.

Amid global criticism, US officials emphasized the US role in strengthening humanitarian shipments to Gaza through the Rafah crossing. Kirby said a U.S. military transport plane landed in Egypt on Friday carrying about 26,000 kilograms (57,000 pounds) of food, water and medicine destined for the Gaza Strip.

“We recognize the suffering of the people of Gaza, and we are doing everything we can to not only get goods to Gaza, but to lead a genuine international effort to get goods there.” ” he said.

Kirby said less than 100 trucks passed through Rafah Gate on Friday, about half the daily volume entering Gaza during the week-long humanitarian ceasefire late last month.

“Obviously this is not the level we want,” he said, noting that Israel is preparing to open an additional testing facility in Kerem Shalom on the Israel-Gaza border. He pointed out that the situation should be alleviated as much as possible. capacity.

However, the United Nations and other aid agencies say that even though the trucks are entering the Gaza Strip in Rafah, ground attacks and a general lack of security in southern Gaza mean that reconstruction and famine are at a critical time. They say the distribution of supplies has been hampered. And sick.

The Israel Defense Forces announced on Friday that the attempt to free the hostages had failed. “Our forces stormed a Hamas compound and eliminated the terrorists involved in the kidnapping and capture of the hostages,” chief spokesman Adm. Daniel Hagari said, adding that two Israeli soldiers were seriously injured in the mission and the hostages were taken. He said he was not rescued. He did not accept Hamas’ claim that hostage Sahar Baruch, 25, died during the rescue, but his home kibbutz in Beiri announced that Baruch had died.

Agreement between European Parliament and member states regulates artificial intelligence, social media and search engines

Landmark AI Regulation The world’s first comprehensive law regulating artificial intelligence has been agreed in a landmark agreement between the European Parliament and EU member states after 37 hours of lengthy negotiations.

The agreement was described as “historic” by Thierry Breton, the EU commissioner responsible for various European laws that govern social media and search engines and include major companies such as X, TikTok and Google. Ta.

Prime Minister Breton said 100 people were in the same room for almost three days to get the deal done. He said it was “worth a few hours’ sleep” to complete the “historic” deal.

Landmark AI Regulation Carme Artigas, Spain’s Secretary of State for Artificial Intelligence, who moderated the negotiations, said France and Germany supported the document, but that high-tech companies from those countries should encourage small and medium-sized enterprises to innovate. There have also been reports that the United States is fighting for a more moderate approach to the United States.

The agreement will put the EU in line with the United States, China and the United Kingdom in the race to regulate artificial intelligence and protect citizens from risks, including the potential threats to life that many fear from rapidly evolving technologies. You’ll be ahead of the curve.

Officials provided few details about what exactly the future law, which could take effect as early as 2025, would include.

The political agreement between the European Parliament and EU member states on new laws to regulate AI has been a bitter battle, with disputes over the underlying model, which targets general rather than specific purposes.

But there have also been long negotiations over AI-driven surveillance that police, employers and retailers could use to film people in public in real time and detect mental distress.

The European Parliament has enforced a ban on the use of biometric technologies, including real-time surveillance and emotional recognition, with three exceptions, Breton said.

This means that police can only use this invasive technology in the event of an unexpected threat of terrorist attack, when searching for victims, or when prosecuting serious crimes. Brando Benefei, who led the European Parliament’s four-year battle to regulate AI and co-led the parliamentary negotiating team with Romanian lawmaker Dragos Tudrace, said an “independent authority” would need to give the go-ahead for AI regulation. He also said he had secured a guarantee. “Predictive policing” to prevent police abuse and the presumption of innocence in crimes.

Our aim is to ensure that Europe’s AI ecosystem develops with a human-centered approach that respects fundamental rights and human values, builds trust, and raises awareness about how to make the most of this AI. The goal was to enact a law to ensure that. “This is happening before our eyes,” he said at a post-midnight press conference in Brussels.

Mr. Tudorache said, “We tried to deny law enforcement the tools they need to fight crime, the tools they need to fight fraud, the tools they need to give our citizens a safe life.” There has never been.” What we achieved was a ban on AI technologies that determine or pre-determine who will commit a crime. ”

The basis of the agreement is a risk-based tier system in which the highest level of regulation applies to machines that pose a hazard. The greatest risk to health, safety and human rights.

Originally, this was intended to include all systems in which he had a business with more than 10,000 users.

Currently, the highest risk category is defined by the number of computer transactions required to train a machine, known as “floating point operations per second” (flops).

According to sources, there is only one model that falls under this new definition: GPT4.

Legislative regulations still place significant obligations on AI services, including to disclose the data used to train machines for everything from writing newspaper articles to diagnosing cancer. Contains basic rules.

Mr. Tudorache said: “We are the first in the world to introduce real regulations for #AI and the digital world of the future powered by AI, guiding the development and advancement of this technology in a human-centric direction.” said. Previously, the EU had made past mistakes in which giant tech companies like Facebook were allowed to grow into multibillion-dollar companies without any obligation to regulate content on their platforms, including election interference. He said he was determined not to. Child abuse and hate speech.

Strong and comprehensive regulation by the EU “could set a strong example for many governments considering regulation,” says
Professor at Columbia Law School and expert on the EU and digital regulation. Anu Bradford said. Other countries “may not emulate all of the provisions, but are likely to emulate many aspects of them.”

AI companies required to comply with EU rules are likely to extend some of their obligations to markets outside the continent, Bradford told The Associated Press. “At the end of the day, retraining separate models for different markets is not efficient,” she said.